Internet dating over the life span: Users’ relationships wants
36. Menkin, J. An excellent., Robles, T. F., Wiley, J. F., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2015). Psychology and you can aging, 31 , 987-993.
38. Paul, An excellent. (2014). Is on the net most readily useful thatn off-line to possess conference lovers? Depends: looking for so you’re able to get married or to date? Cyberpsychology, Conclusion, and Social networking, 17 , 1-cuatro.
39. Prestage, G., Bavinton, B., Grierson, J., Down, We., Enthusiastic, P., Bradley, J., & Duncan, D. (2015). Matchmaking one of Australian gay and you may bisexual boys: relationship or connecting? Supporting and you can Choices, 19 , 1905-1913.
40. Pronk, T. Yards., & Denissen, J. chemistry vs eharmony J. (2019). A rejection Head-Set: Choice Overload in the Matchmaking. Social Emotional and Identification Research.
41. Ramirez, A., Sumner, E. Meters., Fleuriet, C., & Cole, M. (2014). Whenever dating people fulfill offline: The outcome out of modality turning on relational communications between on the internet daters. Diary out of Pc-Mediated Interaction, 20 , 99-114.
42. Rosenfeld, Yards. J., Thomas, R. J., & Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating everyone: How online dating in america displaces different ways from conference. Process of your own National Academy out-of Sciences, 116 , 17753-17758.
43. Stoicescu, M. (2019). The fresh new globalized dating community: Reframing the matchmaking techniques as a result of dating. Log from Comparative Browse when you look at the Anthropology and you will Sociology, 10 , 21-32.
Relationship apps and you may web sites bring enough potential for all those to get to know others outside of a busy, active area particularly Toronto. (more…)